On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:05:25 +0100, David G wrote:
> Toms Hardware have done a report comparing it to the HP8250. The
> Canon is slightly cheaper to run. See here
>
> http://www.tomshardware.com/2005/12/...et/page15.html
Difficult to compare - it always depends on the numbers that you assume.
Example: Canon specs 360 pages of BW text prints (5% coverage). For a
recommended price of $16.25 that's 4.5 cents/page. Tom names 0.02 cts
For A4 photos he names $1.20 - how/why? Spec is 490 pages @ 5%. Real
tests I know are 69 pages. This would be $14.25 * 4 / 69 = $0.82 / page
Is it fair to compare a 4-color Pixma against an 8-color HP?
It's difficult to accept general price assumptions, as long as you don't
add your own priorities. Example: when you refill Canon's or HP's
cartridges, the price may be drop to 1/10. Canon's price is around
$1000/litre, while other sources are $100 or less. This would be weekly
refilling for around 18 months (which is a recommended life time of
the ink).
- Martin